Living By The Gun cont.
This past week, the Supreme Court upheld the part of the American Constitution which states that the “…right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” in a landmark decision on “hand guns”.
The decision stems from a case of a Washington DC Security Guard and the Washington DC “ban” on guns.
Tho I see the reasoning behind “shall not be infringed”, I have a problem with how owning a “hand gun” fulfills the preceding part of that Amendment and the statement “A well regulated militia being necessary to the Security of a free State…”.
Do we now consider all that own hand guns members of the “militia” or better yet, National Guard.